皇冠信用网
热门标签

皇冠管理端登3网址:Apex court can act on written submissions without oral ones

时间:1个月前   阅读:6   评论:1

皇冠管理端登3网址皇冠管理端登3网址(www.99cx.vip)实时更新发布最新最快最有效的皇冠管理端登3网址、皇冠管理端登3手机网址,包括新2登3手机网址,新2登3备用网址,皇冠登3最新网址,新2足球登3网址,新2网址大全。

THE authorities are clear, and the lawyers are right. The Federal Court can make a ruling even if there are no submissions from former prime minister Najib Razak’s counsel.

Then Court of Appeal judge Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim in a 2018 case of Mohamad Salleh Ismail & Anor v Nurul Izzah Anwar & Anor said: “Submissions, whether they be oral or written, play an important role in assisting the court in appreciating the evidence and the legal principles in play in a case. But submissions, be they written or oral, are built upon the available evidence or materials already before the trial court. 

“They put into context the respective cases for the litigating parties and how they would present their perspectives in order to convince the court in order to get a favourable decision. No amount of submissions, be they written or oral, amount to evidence.

“There is therefore nothing in the submissions that the court did not already hear during the course of the trial. That said, there are no express legal provisions that have exalted the position of oral submission such that it must, without fail, be extended by the court to counsel in all cases.

“Rather, it would depend on the particular judge whether any submission needs to be filed by any party at the end of the whole case before a decision can be made. In some cases, the need for any submissions may not be relevant at all. 

,

皇冠体育官网开户www.hg108.vip)是一个开放皇冠体育官网即时比分、皇冠体育官网开户的平台。皇冠体育官网开户平台(www.hg108.vip)提供最新皇冠体育官网登录,皇冠体育官网APP下载包含新皇冠体育官网代理、会员APP。

,

“Indeed, even after directing parties to file written submissions and for them to submit orally, there is nothing to prevent the court from changing its mind and to proceed on only the written submissions to decide even without the ‘benefit’ of reading written submissions or hearing oral submissions.

“In short, it would suffice for the court to act on written submissions only, in the absence of oral submission. Indeed, they may amplify the effect of the application of certain legal principles which may be in play. As such, nothing much can turn on the lack of oral submissions having been heard from both counsel before the learned trial judge came up with her decision.”

With such clarity, there is no more succinct statement on the legal position. 

Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim is currently Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak and one of the five judges in the panel of the apex court panel hearing the final appeal of Najib in the SRC International Sdn Bhd case. – August 21, 2022.

* Hafiz Hassan reads The Malaysian Insight.

* This is the opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insight. Article may be edited for brevity and clarity.


转载说明:本文转载自Sunbet。

上一篇:Telegram好玩的群组:Local telcos to be given priority in 5G rollout

下一篇:手机新2管理端(www.hg108.vip):Citigroup says it will close Russian consumer business

网友评论

  • 2022-09-02 00:16:05

    The healthcare group said a resurgence in elective medical procedures and recovery of the health tourism sector is also expected to bode well for the group in the current year.同意大家